Honorable magistrates, a little modesty, a little morality, a little work and a lot of law and the Constitution

2026-09-13 12:06:30Pikëpamje SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Honorable magistrates, a little modesty, a little morality, a little work and a
Illustrative photo

We hear so much about magistrates' salaries, the conflict is so absurd, so out of touch with real life and law, that one might think that the principle has lost its value.

The conflict produced by a decision of the Constitution, which has not resolved social and vital conflicts for miners, farmers, landowners, and the homeless, resolved the magistrate-executive conflict.

Therefore, the principle lost its value.

It lost its value, just as the "3-month investigation deadline" that stems from the Constitution, to which the prosecutor bows to show his strength to the State Treasury for a few thousand euros in his additional salary, has lost its value for years.

He also missed the "3-year" detention period, the 1-month deadline for the disclosure of decisions, the 1-month trial period in the Administrative Court, etc., etc. for years.

Principles that magistrates learned after they learned how much they were paid.

But they learned them once and, as of 2018, they have never implemented them.

Or does the Constitution footnote these legal principles and, in bold, has the decision to return the KLP and KLGJ to the chief financial officers?

What about those ECHR decisions on compensating citizens for delayed trials?

Hasn't the mail delivered them yet? Haven't they reached the CFO's desk?

Honorable magistrates!

A little modesty, a little morality, a little work, and a lot of law and the Constitution.

To exert pressure on the State Treasury with the weapon that this Constitution has given you (the decision, but this time without an opponent), is to threaten national security.

Neither more nor less: a crime against the constitutional order.

You either don't know, or you are so confident in your strength that you are not afraid even when you endanger national order and security, that is, the state itself.

Who is investigating this crime? Who is protecting the state this time?

What form does a coup d'état by magistrates have to take to be called such?

When does an attack on the constitutional order and national security exist for you, magistrate? When is it a criminal offense?

How do you differ from the oligarchs you are supposed to investigate? How do you differ from your subjects?

They abuse property, wealth, duty, etc., etc.; you, with the right.

Where does the difference lie? The consequences fall on the state equally.

This state, from which you ask for money for work not done, but with formulas from economists of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, not with decisions of constitutional institutions (Parliament).


Video