The Constitutional Court held two hearings today regarding the mandate of the Foreign Minister, Olta Xhaçka.
In the morning, the complaint from Enkelejd Alibeaj's group was examined, which requested the annulment of the decision of the Assembly not to convey to the constitutional body the legitimacy of the mandate of the deputy, at the same time the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olta Xhaçka.
While on Wednesday afternoon, the lawsuit filed by Sali Berisha's group against the Foreign Minister, Olta Xhaçka, was examined.
After the session, the democratic deputy Agron Shehaj said that it is very clear that the minister has benefited from public property.
The democratic MP emphasized that if Xhaçka comes out as, he said, "washed", the credibility of the Constitutionalist would be called into question.
"It is very clear, Ms. Xhačka, the Foreign Minister, has benefited from public property. He did this using his husband and sister-in-law. Today, Xhaçka's lawyer admitted himself that the foreign citizen who received the status of strategic investor to hide Xhaçka's husband, is Mrs. Xhaçka's sister-in-law. So the decision in our judgment is very simple. We believe that the Constitutional Court has created a precedent, a standard, to remove the mandate of deputies if they benefit from public property. We are convinced that there is only one option in the face of this abuse and corrupt act, otherwise it would really be a very big damage to the credibility of this court, which with its decision would remove the deputy Xhaçka", said the deputy Agron Shehaj.
Asked if there is a claim from the defense side and the Assembly, that the 3-month deadline for the review has been exceeded, the democratic deputy said that if the Court will be right, there is no reason for claims.