DREAM / The Prime Minister resigns and wakes up under the Parisian bridge!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

SPAK prosecutor spoke as a judge, acquitted colleagues Braho and Nakuçi for Ahmetaj's evidence

2022-12-29 15:08:41Investigim SHKRUAR NGA ENDRIT HABILAJ

SPAK prosecutor spoke as a judge, acquitted colleagues Braho and Nakuçi

" For the specific case, it does not appear from the referred prosecutors that unfounded accusations have been raised, evidence has been hidden or other persons have been avoided from criminal responsibility ".

This phrase was not said by a court, but by SPAK , which in exceeding its powers is also taking the power of judges.

Whether or not the two prosecutors Klodian Braho and Eneid Nakuçi investigated Arben Ahmetaj and whether or not they filed the charges properly should not have been declared by SPAK, but by the court which, according to the laws of judicial reform, has the powers to evaluate the files and to considered the evidence.

Although the law is clear and binding for everyone, the above phrase was said by a court, but by a SPAK prosecutor who, exceeding his powers, took on the role of a judge by hastening to close the investigations against two prosecutors of the incinerators. reported by Adriatik Doçi for abuse of office and concealment of evidence.

As it results from the acts, only 13 days were enough for the prosecutor Alfred Shehu to save his two colleagues who did not see the evidence of Ahmetaj's luxury trips, which were constantly paid by the accused of the incinerators.

Not finding exhaustive arguments, the same prosecutor of SPAK justifies the decision not to start the investigation against Eneid Nakuc and Klodian Braho by taking the powers of the court and returning to a court that itself investigates and judges itself, even though the roles in justice are separately, the prosecutor investigates and the court examines.

Prosecutor Alfred Shehu talks about the internal conviction of the two prosecutors, when in fact the internal conviction is the exclusive right of the judges who decide on the case based on the evidence, which then creates their internal conviction.

Internal conviction does not belong to the prosecutor, nor Eneid Nakuc nor Klodian Braho or even Alfred Shehu who, according to the law, have the right to represent the state's accusation in court and raise accusations based on reasonable suspicion.

Are the several million-dollar bills for staying in Arben Ahmetaj's luxury hotels reasonable suspicions, which are scientifically proven by the expert reports ? The answer is undoubtedly that they are more than that, they are evidence./ tch


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×