DREAM / The Prime Minister resigns and wakes up under the Parisian bridge!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

The three paradoxes of those who are disturbed by Edi Rama's speech

2022-06-24 20:09:00Pikëpamje SHKRUAR NGA MERO BAZE
The three paradoxes of those who are disturbed by Edi Rama's speech
Mero Baze

The language debate used by Edi Rama at the EU Summit with the Western Balkan countries is unfortunately poorer than his language. 

The first paradox of the debate is the fact that an opposition which is led by a leader who is punished, isolated and warned by the West, in order not to have a leader, is wasting the crocodile that Edi Rama's speech is ruining us with The West. Sali Berisha's being at the head of these eunuchs who cry for the West is an act of war against the West. Today, thankfully it is only in their name and not in the name of Albania.

A party that elects at its head the only leader in the history of Albania declared "a non grata" by the US and pursued in isolationist policies by the EU, does not need to speak against the West because it has meanwhile voted against the West. 

So it is good to save tears and save them when Sali Berisha dies. Then they can become free people and talk about the fate of Albania. For now, they do not have the power to decide for themselves, and not for Albania.

The second paradox is that Edi Rama's speech has found more approval in the west and especially in the western press and has only worried the anti-westerners of Albania.

Yesterday I saw many tweets or comments from many international personalities, even from those who could not admire Edi Rama who wrote "that when he is right he is right".

I have seen almost no negative comments in the Western press, and almost no paranoid writing, to consider Edi Rama's speech as his attempt to drive Albania away from Europe. On the contrary, his painful complaint, which resembled more like a child's despairing oil, in front of a gate that is not opening, is an indication of Albania's insistence on entering the EU gates and not any desire to leave it.

The third paradox is that his harsh language with Bulgaria helped the pro-Western political forces in Bulgaria to unblock the situation and ruined the work of more anti-Western politicians in Tirana, who also started crying for Bulgaria. Edi Rama's debate with Bulgaria was not hostile, but tense. His nervous comments with some Bulgarian officials, the reminder that he recognized the Bulgarian minority in Albania with an approach that proves the western standards of Albania on this issue, and even more the happy phone call of Borisov who himself informed the Prime Minister of Albania about The fall of the Bulgarian veto does not indicate hostility to Bulgaria, but a strong dynamics of cooperation, which have a dramatic side because they were the cause of the blockade of the two countries on the road to the EU. Most Bulgarian politicians, are on the side of Albania and Macedonia in this history, but are now hostages of previous political developments within their country. For this reason, Ed Rama's harsh language has helped more of Bulgaria's western politicians to act, and has upset some Albanians in Tirana who want us not to disturb Bulgaria in order to maintain the embargo against the two countries.

In the already banal spiral where the process of green light for the opening of negotiations with Albania has entered, we no longer have anything in hand but to cry in despair on the sofa of the gates of Europe where we want to enter. We do not have the luxury of crying at the gates of Moscow, nor do we surround Albania with barbed wire. 

Edi Rama has mourned on our behalf in the house of those who still do not open the door for us. The only debate that may be in this case with those who really love Albania in the west, is whether his cry honors us. At this time, I think his speech is the only good export commodity we have for Europe.


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×