Reward for a job?! What the evidence really reveals about Rovena Voda

2023-05-24 22:02:35Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Reward for a job?! What the evidence really reveals about Rovena Voda
Former Deputy Interior Minister Rovena Voda

If you are going to hit someone in politics, the biggest damage is to try to discredit him, especially with false stories and evidence.

And when this is accompanied by a criminal sentence, the damage becomes irreparable. No matter how much you throw at the criminal conviction, the mud that remains turns into a wall for the professional career and the path to politics.

Ajo është ish-zëvendësministrja e brendshme Rovena Voda. Dikur, konsiderohej një prej zyrtareve më energjike dhe të vlerësuara. Të paktën deri më 13 Korrik të vitit 2021 kur Prokuroria e Posaçme Kundër Korrupsionit shpërndau me bujë lajmin për arrestimin e saj. Lajmi përbënte një sensacion pasi më në fund, struktura e re po godiste në nivele të larta, ata të konsideruar peshqit e mëdhenj. Por, dalja në publik e akuzave dhe provave mbi të cilat ishte arrestuar Voda, filluan të shfrynin dosjen.

“Ndjehem e lënduar. Ky është një mësim se si nuk duhet ngritur një akuzë”, u shpreh ish zv. ministrja e Brendshme Rovena Hoda.

“Qëllimi i SPAK për rezultate që të kënaqet politika është super i gabuar. Është dështimi më i madh i mundshëm i SPAK si koncept, por edhe e asaj që quhet reformë në drejtësi. Se për këtë punë u bë reforma në drejtësi, për këtë SPAK se nuk është se ka ndryshuar ndonjë gjë tjetër në pjesën tjetër të drejtësisë”, tha ish-ministri i Drejtësisë Ylli Manjani.

Në një rrëfim emocional që shpesh herë ndërpritet për shkak të tronditjes që i sjell historia, Voda ka gjetur forcat dhe ka vendosur të flasë për të vërtetën e saj. Për një histori të dyshuar dhe të dënuar për korrupsion në vlera qesharake. Në vlera të cilat shërbyen më tepër për të hedhur baltë dhe për të ngritur suksese imagjinare nga drejtësia, se sa për të goditur peshkaqenët e vërtetë të korrupsionit.

Ironikisht, Rovena Voda u hetua, gjykua dhe në fund u dënua nën dyshimet se kishte ushtruar ndikim të paligjshëm për punësimin në administratë të një personi. Në këmbim, organi I akuzës pretendonte se ajo kishte marrë 1 mijë euro, 1 aparat celular, dhe çka është për të qeshur, një ark me peshk…

“Ta mësojnë gjithë shqiptarët se arka me peshk nuk ekziston. Është hipotetike”, tha Rovena Hoda.

The registration of the proceedings against Voda, strangely, happens only 24 hours after she had received an important international evaluation. She had just been announced as 1 of 5 women in the Euro-Asia region who brought change in politics. And suddenly, the story of corruption broke out with a fish crate that naturally caused quite a sensation. In fact, receipt of this product was never confirmed. Everything was based on interceptions between two other defendants who were discussing among themselves that they were thinking of giving him such a gift.

Reward for a job?! What the evidence reveals about Rovena Voda

In the decision, which was also upheld on appeal, it was said that the deputy minister had promised her former colleague, lawyer Majlinda Hasani, the employment of a relative of hers named Florida Bey.

From the interception of the conversations between Hasan and Bey, they talked about the monetary amount of 1 thousand euros, the mobile device and the fish box that they offered to Mrs. Voda.

In the end, she was sentenced to 10 months in prison, which she completed under house arrest.

"I didn't even think that I could do such a thing, let alone put it into action. My compass has been working with integrity in the Ministry. I only knew one of them. The other one didn't even have a cell phone contact", said the former Minister.

What impresses in this whole story, referring also to the defense of the former deputy minister Voda, is the fact that the latter does not result in any SPAK interception. The environmental surveillance of the other two defendants and some security footage of her car entering the Port of Durrës were taken as evidence.

"My car enters every border point, former deputy interior minister. "How is it possible that the defendants were both in my car and in their car being intercepted at the same time, referring to the camera", said Voda.

She denies having received material benefits in exchange for the promise of a possible job in the administration. Voda in the appeal assesses that the wording of the decision is in some cases incomprehensible, contradicts itself or contradicts the reasons for the decision and that the reasons related to the decisive facts are not cited in it.

"If you analyze it, you will understand that the body of the accusation was rushed by mistake or on purpose. I can't say because I'm not like them. If I had evidence, I would have taken you to court," said former Minister Voda.

Regarding the allegations of material values, Voda cites that they are not proven to have been given or received.

"Zero worth of interception of my conversations. "Zero talks about material benefits from the act of mobile phone expertise," said Rovena Voda.

As for the benefit of the mobile phone, SPAK had a video test in a bar. However, the mobile device was never found and it was not proven that it was used by the official or her relatives.

"It seems from the pictures that he gives me the phone and I am surprised," the former Minister told Inside Story.

"The mobile phone I have used does not match the donated mobile phone.

As can be seen from the footage, it seems that she appears surprised by the gift that she says she returned to the other defendant a few hours later. Despite the fact that she returned it, she argues, among other things, that this item was not given as part of a promise or favor.

The mobile device was offered to me simply as a social gift on the occasion of March 8 and nothing more. The mobile device was offered as a social and courtesy gift, on the eve of the traditional holiday of March 8. Moreover, this gift was returned and not kept.

The written documents proved, among other things, that Florida Bey had applied for at least 11 job positions. If she had secured the job through bribery, the question naturally arises as to why she had to apply to several places. Moreover, it did not turn out in the end that he was hired.


Video