INSURRECTION/ SP MPs rebel, drag Gjati to vote on territorial division!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

Cooperation between autocrats raises concerns in Washington

2026-08-13 17:22:35Kosova&Bota SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Cooperation between autocrats raises concerns in Washington
Officials from China, Russia and Iran during a meeting in Beijing

The world's major autocracies – China, Russia, Iran and North Korea – are increasingly relying on each other's resources, military capabilities and geopolitical influence to withstand Western pressure.

For Washington, the strategic dilemma is no longer simply whether these four countries are cooperating, but the extent to which their alignment is changing the balance of power on several fronts simultaneously.

The urgency of this issue has become clear on the front lines in Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia used North Korean ballistic missiles in an August 11 attack on the city of Zaporizhia that killed seven people and injured dozens. The attack came amid reports that a North Korean missile unit, equipped with up to 120 ballistic missiles, has begun deploying in western Russia.

Meanwhile, Pyongyang tested another ballistic missile on August 11, just days before major U.S.-South Korea military exercises, prompting a joint response from the U.S. and 40 other countries. The situation highlights the dual security pressures facing Washington and its partners in both Europe and the Indo-Pacific region.

David J. Kramer, executive director of the George W. Bush Institute and former senior U.S. diplomat, told Radio Free Europe (RFE/RL) that although cooperation between these four states – increasingly referred to by the acronym CRINK – is now operational, it does not reach the level of a formal alliance, comparable to NATO.

"It's operational and selective," Kramer told REL.

This assessment reflects a reality that is increasingly gaining support among policymakers in Washington: CRINK is neither a tightly integrated military bloc nor simply a term used for rhetorical convenience. Rather, it functions as a flexible network, in which members cooperate where their interests align, enabling each regime to improve some of its strategic weaknesses.

The war in Ukraine has become an important arena for the exchange of military capabilities between CRINK members.

Iranian-designed Shahed drones played a key role in Russia's offensive campaign during the early stages of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, launched by Moscow in February 2022.

Meanwhile, North Korea's involvement in the conflict has expanded significantly. Pyongyang has sent troops to support Moscow's war effort, with estimates rising from an initial figure of 12,000 to 15,000 soldiers, to reports suggesting the number could be as high as 50,000, while North Korea has also supplied Russia with ballistic missiles.

Practical cooperation

China's role remains less direct in military terms, but it is still important.

Beijing has helped finance Russia's war by buying energy from Russia, while also providing Moscow with dual-use technology.

"All of these countries have supported and reinforced each other," Kramer said.

The cooperation also creates opportunities for military learning and technology transfer. Kramer noted that Russia has developed its own version of the Iranian Shahed drone, while North Korea has benefited from sending troops and missiles and is likely receiving technology from Russia in return.

North Korean missiles that Russia is using against Ukraine

The four countries do not have a common defense treaty, a unified command structure or a binding strategic doctrine, and analysts say there does not appear to be any ideology that binds them beyond their opposition to the West, particularly their opposition to the US-led order.

“This cooperation has already yielded results, supporting war efforts, propping up regimes embroiled in conflicts, and undermining democratic norms. However, its reach is limited: the grouping is transactional, lacking a common leadership and divided by competing interests, without a shared plan for an alternative order,” according to analysts at the Lowy Institute, an international policy think tank based in Sydney, Australia.

China remains the dominant partner in its relations with Moscow, leaving Russia much more dependent on Beijing than vice versa.

China has not gone so far as to offer the level of direct support that the Kremlin might have sought when the two countries declared "borderless" friendship in 2022.

Beijing is also closely watching Russia's deepening relations with North Korea, a development that Kramer said China is not pleased with.

However, these differences have not hindered practical cooperation.

"I think this presents a bigger challenge, because where they seem to be united is in trying to weaken, whether it's neighboring states, democracy or particularly the role and credibility of the United States," he said.

This does not make CRINK a unified geopolitical bloc. On the contrary, its members have proven to be able to identify areas of common interest and offer support to each other when doing so serves their individual strategic goals.

Kramer i referohet BRICS-it, duke vënë në dukje se përpjekjet për ta bashkuar një grup më të gjerë shtetesh në mënyrë të unifikuar nuk ka qenë e suksesshme. Për dallim, CRINK-u ka qenë më efektiv kur anëtarët e tij identifikojnë “objektiva të favorshëm” e specifikë dhe fusha ku mund ta forcojnë njëri-tjetrin.

Qëndrimi i Uashingtonit

Ky perceptim më i gjerë i kërcënimit po riformëson debatin në Uashington, ku ligjvënësit dhe analistët e sigurisë kombëtare po i shohin gjithnjë e më shumë konfliktet rajonale përmes një këndvështrimi të ndërlidhur strategjik.

Senatori republikan, John Curtis, nga Utah, anëtar i Komitetit të Senatit për Marrëdhëniet me Jashtë, theksoi se rezultatet në Evropën Lindore kanë pasoja të drejtpërdrejta strategjike për parandalimin në rajonin e Indo-Paqësorit.

“Lejimi që Putini të korrë fitore në Ukrainë do të ndikonte në mënyrë dramatike në shumë zona të tjera të botës”, tha Curtis për REL-in, duke iu referuar veçanërisht ambicieve të Pekinit ndaj Tajvanit. “Nuk ka dyshim se ata po e shikojnë reagimin tonë”.

Senatori Rick Scott, republikan nga Florida, shprehu të njëjtin qëndrim, duke i thënë REL-it se mposhtja e agresionit rus është kyç për parandalimin e një rrjeti më të gjerë të shteteve autoritare.

Admirali në pension Mark Montgomery, njëherësh drejtor i lartë i Qendrës për Inovacionin në Teknologjinë dhe Sigurinë Kibernetike në Fondacionin për Mbrojtjen e Demokracive dhe bashkautor i librit Axis of Aggressors (Boshti i Agresorëve), i tha REL-it se hulumtimi i tij ka dokumentuar më shumë se 600 raste të bashkëpunimit mes katër vendeve.

Montgomery dha një mendim të prerë: Ukraina po përballet në mënyrë efektive me elemente të të katër kundërshtarëve njëkohësisht. Teherani ka furnizuar me kapacitete dronësh; Pheniani ka ofruar trupa dhe municione; Pekini ka furnizuar komponentë me përdorim të dyfishtë, ndërsa Moska ka ofruar përvojë taktike dhe duket se, në këmbim, po ofron teknologji ushtarake.

Kjo gjë krijon një sistem adaptues. Meqë secili anëtar mund të ndihmojë në kompensimin e dobësive ekonomike, teknologjike ose ushtarake të një anëtari tjetër, presioni ndaj një vendi mund të zbutet pjesërisht përmes bashkëpunimit me të tjerët.

Ndërkaq, Moska dhe Pekini kanë përdorur mjete si vetot në Kombet e Bashkuara dhe veprime të tjera për të bllokuar përpjekjet ndërkombëtare për të ushtruar presion ndaj partnerëve të tyre.

Përballja me rrjetin

CRINK-u, megjithatë, nuk është i pathyeshëm, sipas analistëve.

Mungesa e një strukture formale të një aleance është një prej burimeve të cenueshmërisë së tij.

Kina ka interesat e veta dhe e ka kufizuar shkallën e mbështetjes së drejtpërdrejtë ushtarake që i ofron Rusisë. Pekini është po ashtu i shqetësuar për thellimin e marrëdhënieve mes Moskës dhe Phenianit, ndërsa katër vendet nuk kanë një doktrinë të unifikuar strategjike.

Kramer argued that the US and its allies should respond by cooperating more closely in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, rather than treating the threats posed by the four states as separate problems.

He called for more aggressive action, such as using the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the US to impose sanctions on officials and others involved in serious human rights abuses and corruption. He said broader sanctions could also be used more aggressively against the four regimes.

But Kramer stressed that military aid to Ukraine remains key to the West's response.

"Supporting Ukraine with military assistance is absolutely vital," he said, referring to Russia's continued attacks with cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, as well as Ukraine's urgent need for interceptor missiles.

The first test of the West's resolve remains focused on Ukraine, where the lack of air defense systems leaves civilians and infrastructure vulnerable to Russian attacks with Iranian-designed drones and North Korean missiles.

The consequences extend beyond Europe. Kramer noted that Taiwan is among Ukraine's biggest supporters because Taipei understands that how the West responds to Russia's war will be important for how China views Taiwan.

This creates a strategic link between the European and Indo-Pacific fronts. The United States and its allies may face geographically distinct crises, but the governments behind these challenges are increasingly capable of supporting each other.

As Washington faces threats in Europe, the Indo-Pacific, and the Middle East, treating each front as a separate problem risks overlooking the ways in which Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea can reinforce each other.

CRINK does not need to become a formal alliance to pose a significant challenge to Western interests. As Kramer's analysis highlights, its members need only continue to identify pragmatic areas where cooperation can strengthen each of them, in the face of what they perceive as pressure from the US and its allies./ REL


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×