Scandal at Oncology, GJKKO's appeal does not change the security measure for doctor Gashi/ Here are the decisions

2024-09-18 13:57:45Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX

Scandal at Oncology, GJKKO's appeal does not change the security measure

The appeal of GJKKO has left in force the security measure "house arrest" for the doctor Edmond Gashi, while softening the security measure from house arrest to mandatory appearance for the pharmacist, Florian Marku.

Meanwhile, Halil Gashi and Brikena Qirjazi, who were under the "obligation to appear" measures, Apeli decided to release them from the security measures

In the GJKKO Appeal, Gashi and others asked for the replacement of the relevant security measures with softer ones. Thus, Edmond Gashi is informed that he requested that the measure of house arrest be lifted.

All persons are being investigated by SPAK in connection with what was considered the Oncology scandal, which was followed by numerous denunciations, not only regarding the lack of medical drugs for people suffering from tumors, but also with the delays and medical treatments of patients.

The SPAK investigation has been registered for "corruption", "abuse of duty" and "medicinal smuggling".

Security measures determined by the GJKKO Appeal

Edmond Gashi, doctor at the Oncology Hospital in QSUNT, accused of the criminal offense of "Abuse of duty", "House arrest"

Emiljano Lela, coordinator at the Oncology Hospital in QSUNT, accused of the criminal offense of "Abuse of duty", "Compulsion to Appear".

Alketa Ymeri (Pere), a doctor at the Oncology Hospital in QSUNT, accused of the criminal offense of "Abuse of duty", "Compulsion to Appear".

Brikena Qirjazi, deputy director at QSUNT charged with duties for the oncology service, accused of the criminal offense of "Abuse of duty", there is no measure, she is being investigated without security measures.

Halil Gashi, accused of the criminal offense of "Concealment of income" without measure, is being investigated without security measures.

Florian Marku accused of the criminal offense of "Trading and transportation of contraband goods" and "Storage or storage of contraband goods", mandatory appearance measure.

For Drilona Kishta, for whom the "Compulsion to Appear" security measure was imposed, accused of the criminal offense "Abuse of Duty", the execution of the criminal decision was not carried out as she was abroad and a notice was placed at the border.

Announcement from GJKKO

The Special Court of Appeal for Corruption and Organized Crime, with a monocratic panel composed of judge Florjan Kalaja, today on 18.09.2024, announced the decision on criminal case no. 39 act, date 09.09.2024 registration, on the appeal of persons under investigation EG, BQ, FM, HG, with subject: "Appeal against decision no. 84, dated 24.07.2024, of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime", disposed of in the case of personal security measures, and decided:

1. Approval of Decision no. 84, dated 24.07.2024 of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime in terms of dispositions against ZEG

2. Amendment of Decision no. 84, dated 24.07.2024 of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime in terms of dispositions against ZFM

3. Assigning to ZFM the security measure "Compulsion to appear before the judicial police", provided by article 234 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering him to appear before the judicial police officer, who is in charge of the investigation , every Wednesday, at 09:00.

4. Repeal of Decision no. 84, dated 24.07.2024 of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime in terms of dispositions against ZHG

5. Dismissal of the request of the Special Prosecutor's Office against Corruption and Organized Crime for the determination of the measure of personal security against the person under investigation ZHG

6. Amendment of Decision no. 84, dated 24.07.2024 of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime in terms of dispositions against Mrs. BQ

7. Dismissal of the request of the Special Prosecutor's Office against Corruption and Organized Crime for the assignment of personal security against the person under investigation Mrs. BQ

8. The filing in the Criminal College of the Supreme Court of the submission on the lack of subject matter competence of the special court in terms of the part of the criminal proceedings with the object of the historical criminal fact of the administration of the "Cobalt" source, with persons under investigation Mrs. BQ and Mrs. DK

9. The judicial secretariat is ordered to submit to the Supreme Court a copy of the acts for the resolution of the dispute of subject competence in this criminal proceeding.
10. Against the dispositions of this decision on personal insurance measures, recourse can be made to the Supreme Court within 45 days, starting this term from the day after the announcement of the reasoned decision.

11. No appeal can be made against the disposition on the submission of the dispute on the subject competence in the Supreme Court.


Video