7 officials of the License Plate Directorate in Durrës were declared innocent, accused of corruption with tenders

2023-11-06 17:07:35Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
7 officials of the License Plate Directorate in Durrës were declared
Illustrative photo

The Special Court against Corruption and Organized Crime has acquitted the 7 officials arrested by SPAK in the Directorate of License Plates and Printing in Durrës, accused of the criminal offenses "Abuse of duty" and "Violation of equality in tenders" committed in cooperation.

The case against the 7 defendants was sent for review in November 2022, while today GJKKO has made the decision to acquit the defendants.

Full Notice:

The Special Prosecutor's Office against Corruption and Organized Crime on 22.11.2021 submitted to the Court the request with the object: Sending for trial the criminal case with No. 293 of 2020, in charge of the defendants AG, ND, Xh.D and YS accused of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" committed in cooperation provided by article 248 and 25 of the Criminal Code, as well as in charge of defendants EM and EH accused of the criminal offense "Violation of the equality of participants in public tenders or auctions" carried out in cooperation provided by article 258 first paragraph 25 of the Criminal Code.

2. After examining the request of the prosecution, the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime (preliminary session) with a panel composed of judge Flora Hajredinaj, with decision No. 6/67 Basic Registry, dated 20.11.2022 decided: sending the case for trial.

3. The trial of this case was conducted with the rules of ordinary trial. At the end of the trial, the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime with a panel composed of judges Erjon Çela, Rudina Palloi and Irena Gjoka, based on articles 25, 248 and 258 of the Criminal Code, articles 388/1 letters a) and b) and 485 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, decided:

1. The not guilty declaration of the defendant AG, for the commission of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" committed in cooperation provided by article 248 - 25 of the Criminal Code, since in application of article 388/1 letters "a" and "b" of Criminal Code, the fact is not proven to exist and the fact does not constitute a criminal offense.

2. The not guilty declaration of the defendant ND, for the commission of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" carried out in cooperation provided by article 248 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as in application of article 388/1 letter "b" of the Criminal Code .Criminal, the fact is not proven to exist.

3. The not guilty declaration of the defendant Xh.D, for the commission of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" carried out in cooperation provided by article 248 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as pursuant to article 388/1 letter "b" of K .Pr. Criminal, the fact is not proven to exist.

4. The not guilty declaration of the defendant YS, for the commission of the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" carried out in cooperation provided by article 248 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as in application of article 388/1 letter "b" of the Criminal Code .Criminal, the fact is not proven to exist.

5. The not guilty declaration of the defendant EM, for the commission of the criminal offense "Violation of the equality of participants in public tenders or auctions" carried out in cooperation provided by article 258 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as pursuant to article 388/1 letter "b" of Criminal Code, the fact does not constitute a criminal offense.

6. The not guilty declaration of the defendant EH, for the commission of the criminal offense "Violation of the equality of participants in public tenders or auctions" carried out in cooperation provided by article 258 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as in application of article 388/1 letter "b" of Criminal Code, the fact does not constitute a criminal offense.

7. The not guilty declaration of the defendant HK, for committing the criminal offense "Violation of the equality of participants in public tenders or auctions" carried out in cooperation provided by article 258 - 25 of the Criminal Code, as in application of article 388/1 letter "b" of Criminal Code, the fact does not constitute a criminal offense.

8. Procedural costs during the investigation phase as well as court costs are left as incurred.

9. Against this decision, an appeal can be made by the parties within 15 (fifteen) days to the Special Court of Appeal for Corruption and Organized Crime, which period starts from the day after the notification of the reasoned decision


Video