Aldi or Anea? Who are the businessmen brothers fined 1 million euros by Laert Haxhiu! (The "pampered" of hundreds of tenders)

2026-05-22 11:53:33Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Aldi or Anea? Who are the businessmen brothers fined 1 million euros by Laert
Laert Haxhiu

SPAK convict, Artan Tafani, in his testimony at the Special Court, within the framework of the trial against the criminal group led by Laert Haxhiu .

During the hearing, Tafani stated that the group had imposed a fine of 1 million euros on a businessman from Lushnja.

According to his testimony, the businessman had conflicts with well-known people in the area, including Land Shyti, known by the nickname " Mustaqe Kuqi ".

Tafani said that the businessman had sought help from Haxhiu's group due to these problems, but then the situation took a different turn.

"We asked him for 1 million euros. He came himself for help and then Laertes imposed the fine," Tafani declared before the court.

According to him, the group had initially received 120 million lek and a total of about 360 thousand euros from the businessman.

VoxNews has learned that the businessman mentioned in the testimony is suspected to be Anea Llazi, one of the owners of the construction company " LLAZO ", based in the village of Bishqethem, Lushnja.

Aldi or Anea? Who are the businessmen brothers fined 1 million euros by Laert
"LAZZO"

The company is owned by brothers Anea and Aldi Llazi , who each own 50% of the shares.

The name of the company “ LLAZO ” has often been mentioned in connection with public tenders and dubious procedures.

Aldi or Anea? Who are the businessmen brothers fined 1 million euros by Laert

According to data reported over the years, the company has benefited from millions of euros in public funds through state contracts.

©Copyright Vox News

This article is exclusive to Vox News, and is copyrighted under Law No. 35/2016, "On Copyright and Related Rights". The article may be republished by other media only by citing Vox News and including a link to the source at the end, otherwise any violator will be held liable under Article 178 of Law No. 35/2016.


Video