The SPAK Special Prosecutor's Office has started an asset verification for the mayor of Kamza, Rakip Suli, as well as for the incumbent of Himara, Jorgo Goro.
This, after the registration of criminal proceedings against the two, who are under investigation for abuses of tenders in matters of cleaning the city.
On November 8, Suli appeared at SPAK for the second time in a few days, he stated that he appeared to submit some documents.
Two days ago he said that " we have to let justice do its job because it is giving hope to Albanians ".
"Let me do my duty, out of respect for the citizens," he added.
His appearance at SPAK came after the questioning by SPAK of the head of the Municipality of Kamza was postponed until the 6th on Wednesday, November 1.
The reason for the postponement is the late arrival of the summons from the police to Rakip Suli.
After reporting the criminal offenses " Exercising illegal influence on persons exercising public functions ", " Abuse of duty ", " Violation of the equality of participants in public tenders or auctions " and " Passive corruption of persons exercising public functions ", SPAK registered criminal proceedings for the municipality headed by Suli .
From the investigations, it has been found that there are several cases of abuses with the compensations of the reconstruction fund, so far out of 10 complainants, 4 of them have been called, while 6 others will be questioned this week.
The residents of Kamza appeared last Tuesday at the premises of the Special Prosecutor's Office to give their statements about the report filed in SPAK a few weeks ago against the mayor.
On behalf of the residents of Kamza, on September 11, the Freedom Party and the councilors of the coalition Together We Win in Kamza, filed criminal charges against the mayor of Kamza, Rakip Suli, in SPAK.
Referring to the SSC report after the inspection in this municipality, but also to the announcement and online council meetings, they demanded criminal prosecution of the elected socialist for several charges such as abuse of office, corruption and violation of equality in tenders.