An Indian couple has won a rare legal battle over their dead son's frozen sperm, allowing them to pursue surrogacy and have a grandchild.
After a four-year legal battle, the Delhi High Court has ordered Ganga Ram Hospital to release the stored sperm, offering Harbir Kaur and Gurvinder Singh hope of continuing their family lineage.
"This trial brought us back to life," a tearful Ms Kaur said after the verdict. “We lost our only son, but now we have the hope of a grandson to fill the void left by his death. It's the only thing that keeps us going."
The couple's 30-year-old son, Preet Inder Singh, was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a form of blood cancer, in 2020 and was admitted to Ganga Ram Hospital for treatment.
Before starting chemotherapy, he decided to save his sperm, hoping to start a family after recovery.
"He was full of life," his mother recalls. "The doctors said the chemotherapy could affect his fertility and he wanted to make sure he could still have a family one day.
“We were all hopeful, thinking we'd be planning his wedding as soon as he got better. He had a girlfriend and they were in love... anything seemed possible at that time.”
However, Preet Inder's health deteriorated and he died three months after his sperm was placed in storage.
"When we lost him, our world fell apart," his mother said. "But we remembered his desire, his hope to have a family.
"That thought gave us the strength to approach the hospital for his sperm, thinking we could honor his legacy by having a grandson."
Ganga Ram Hospital refused to release the sperm, forcing the grieving parents to approach the courts.
"We were heartbroken again when the hospital said no," Ms Kaur said. "But it was our loneliness, our pain that pushed us to keep fighting."
"We thought if he had made the effort to save it, why couldn't we? If his sperm hadn't been preserved, we wouldn't have this glimmer of hope."
Their legal journey culminated last week when Judge Prathiba Singh ruled in their favor, declaring them the legal heirs of their son's sperm.
In her order, the judge said: "Under the prevailing Indian law, there is no prohibition against posthumous reproduction if the consent of the owner of the sperm or the owner of the egg can be demonstrated."
The court said the sample should not be used for any commercial purpose, but the parents had the right to pursue surrogacy.
Reflecting on the decision, Ms Kaur said: “He loved his sisters and they loved him. He was the center of our family.
"I look at his face every morning. This is how I start my day. He may be gone, but he's still with us."