After the decision of GJKKO to return Alqi Bllakos to the cell, his lawyer Sokol Haziraj spoke to the media.
" I don't know for what reasons, despite the behavior of Bllako, who has left the mandate of the deputy, this measure was decided.
It has been presented before the judicial bodies. How can he destroy the evidence when the investigation into this matter is being completed. That I think there was reason for the Special Court of Appeal to take a different position. The truth is that in this country, in this court, a popular fable has become; get up because I killed you, and get off because I killed you.
For the same reasons for the same procedural reasons. The Court of Appeal held a position which it has not yet justified.
Blako was released early because he did not pose a risk of tampering with evidence. What I don't understand is that 'house arrest' and 'prison arrest' are the same thing. Blako came to the court himself because he does not pose a danger.
Blako in the specific case under investigation is not an elected person, the reference to him is wrong. We will appeal to the Supreme Court".
Q: Did you know that your client can leave?
Sokol Haziraj: No, I have no idea. In this particular case, Alqi Blako is not elected, he is an employee of the administration.