Hiding deportation from Greece is not the only violation of special judge Irena Gjoka. Her vetting dossier at the Independent Qualification Commission has ambiguity and strong doubts even as to the judge's property criteria.
Judge Gjoka passed vetting in KPK in 2020. The Public Commissioner appealed the decision seeking her dismissal to the Special Appeals College precisely for the property criterion. But the commissioner withdrew from this request in 2022 and the KPA effectively th place the first-instance vetting decision.
What did you find in Irena Gjoka's wealth? In at least three cases, the judge has declared as 'pencil' the correct non-completion of the declaration forms of property. KPK questions the 2004 form. At the HIDAACI, at that time Irena Gjoka declared a loan taken from her brother worth 20,000 euros.
Meanwhile, in completing the property form within the vetting process, he declares that the foreign was 2 million ALL. The judge considered this human pencil and the KPK recognized it as such.
The loan was taken for the purchase of an apartment worth nearly 46 thousand euros. The second pencil is related to the justification of 15 thousand euros. Irena Gjoka in 2014 stated in HDDIP that the source of this amount is: "Part was saving that year, part was contribution of my former co-living and another part was a gift that my parents made me for the purchase of the apartment on the occasion of the introduction of the new apartment in November 2005."
The Vetting Commission raised questions about the high savings rate, but the judge argued that for a period of time she had the opportunity to save the entire salary, as she lived in her parents' house and all other expenses were paid by the parents.
The judge was also asked about a $4,000 deposit. She says the deposits are not income from new sources, but income from her salary which she converted to American currency.
In the section confidential information, the subject about this deposit clarifies that: "In my name is a deposit in the bank without time, which are of my family of origin, a deposit on which I act on behalf and on behalf of my parents and two brothers in immigration."
The statement of the subject during the administrative investigation does not correspond to its statement in HIDAACI in 2004 regarding the ownership of this deposit, because, contrary to what she stated in 2004, before vetting the judge declares that the income for the creation of this deposit is hers and not her family's.
The judge declares that a deposit of $23,000 created from 1993, when she started her duty until December 2005. She says the amount is her family savings, as until December 2005 she lived with her parents in Fier.
Another 'human pencil' in Irena Gjoka's vetting is also the non-declaration of ownership of a quarter of a flat in Patos. The judge says she has forgotten about the low value of the property in question and its non-use.
©CopyrightVoxNews
This article is exclusive to VoxNews, enjoys the copyright under The Law No. 35/2016, "On copyright and related rights". The article can be republished by other media only by citing VoxNews and finally the source link is placed, otherwise any infringer will be held liable under Article 178 of The Law No. 35/2016.