OPEN LETTER/ Come to the dialogue and listen to me speak, otherwise I will cut off your scholarships, you will rot in prison. Please!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

Alqi Bllak's lawyer: The letter signed by him did not cause any damage, the situation with the evidence is different from what is presented

2023-03-24 17:31:27Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Alqi Bllak's lawyer: The letter signed by him did not cause any damage, the
Elis Bilali, the lawyer of Alqi Bllakos and Arben Dervishaj

Elis Bilali, the lawyer of Alqi Bllakos and Arben Dervishaj, has spoken about the Fier incinerator case, where a preliminary hearing took place today and the file was passed for trial.

Invited to the show "Zone Zero in Top Neës", Bilali stated that from the beginning the Prosecutor's Office had brought charges that had no legal basis against Bllakos and Dervishaj and congratulated today's court regarding the correction.

Lawyer Bllakos stated that the former socialist deputy, at the time he is accused of the incinerators, did not hold a position to be considered a high official, he also said that neither Dervishasj held a public position.

According to lawyer Bilali, the letter signed by Aliq Blako did not cause any damage, as it is simply a follow-up letter. According to him, the situation with the evidence is different from what is presented in the media.

"Today, a preliminary hearing was held for Arben Dervishaj and Alqi Bllakon, it was a marathon session, all parties presented claims that the case could not pass

More specifically from "Passive corruption of high officials", courts in passive corruption exercising public functions. This was our request. Since during that time, Blako was not a high-ranking official, this request arose from the beginning, since the body of the accusation was not clear. We will maintain our position even during the trial on the merits. It is not proven anywhere that the accusations against Bllakos and Dervishaj are not proven by the prosecuting body, perhaps the opposite is proven. The accusation was not right or supported by evidence.

There is a nonsense about Mr. Dervishaj, since at first he misused his duties, but Mr. Dervishaj has never held public office. He was just an administrator of a private company. The prosecution body was forced to change the charge from abuse of office to falsification of documents.

The court simply judges superficially based on the accusations brought by the Prosecution, are they fair or not, so this is in the preliminary session, but then in the trial of the merits it will be judged whether or not these accusations are based on the evidence. There was no decision-making by Mr. Bllako that caused damage, he simply forwarded a letter to the Council of Ministers, it is simply a forwarded letter and did not cause any consequences.

Gjyqtari i seancës paraprake është kufizuar në kompetenca për t’u shprehur sepse nuk ishte gjykim në themel. Akuzat si ndaj Bllakos, por dhe Dervishajt duhet të shuhen, këtë kemi kërkuar. Më lejoni të përgëzoj gjyqtaren e seancës paraprake sepse ka dhënë një vendim gjysmë të drejtë. Gjykata pati guximin që të orientojë Prokurorinë në lidhje me akuzat për Alqi Bllakon nga.Gjykata dhe Prokuroria janë në presion për këtë çështje.

Nuk mund të nrehet një akuzë shpërdorimi detyre për zotin Dervishaj për sa kohë ai nuk është një objekt i posaçëm. Hetimi nuk është bërë si duhet. Në rastin konkret, nga organi u akuzën nuk janë vlerësuar drejt akuzat. Inceneratori i Fierit është realizuar, ndryshe nga çfarë thuhet në media. Aty duhet të ishte realizuar një akt ekspertimi.

I believe and hope very much that the jury judges fairly and in the end decides fairly in favor of Alqi Bllakos and Dervishaj. The accusations and the file leave a lot of room for discussion.

What I can say is that the situation presented in the media and the attempt by the media and the political party to influence the investigation is completely different from the evidence itself." Bilal eats.


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×